- XML Web services have more restrictions than objects delivered via.NET Remoting.
- XML Web services offer open standards that are cross-platform compatible.
- Because of its constraints, XML Web services are generally easier to implement and present fewer design difficulties.
- XML Web services only allow SOAP message formatting, which uses lengthier XML text messages.
- Using a binary formatter to communicate with an XML Web service may be longer than using.NET Remoting.
- The intended users of XML Web services are companies and other organizations.
- Because ASP.NET always hosts XML Web services, they don't require a different hosting solution.
- Customers can get XML Web services and HTML pages from the Internet with equal ease. Therefore, an administrator does not need to open additional ports on a firewall as they use MS-IIS and ASP.NET.
- NET Remoting is not created with interoperability in mind.
- Services created with.NET Remoting cannot be used by clients that are not.NET, despite the transport layer being an open standard like SOAP.
A design philosophy is OOP. Object Oriented Programming is what it stands for. In contrast to outdated procedural programming languages, object-oriented programming (OOP) employs a separate set of programming languages. In OOP, everything is categorised as self-sustaining "objects". As a result, you achieve re-usability using the four core concepts of object-oriented programming. Programmes are organised around objects and data rather than action and logic in the object-oriented programming (OOP) paradigm. Let's use your "Leg" as an example to grasp the object orientation clearly. The class "Leg" is one. Left and right legs are objects of type Leg on your body. A series of electrical impulses supplied through your body parts (through an interface) are what manage or control their primary functions. As a result, the body part serves as an interface between your body and your legs. The Leg is a well-designed class. The attributes of the Leg are m...
Comments
Post a Comment